IN RE VIOXX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

MDL No. 1657.

478 F.Supp.2d 897 (2007)

In re VIOXX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: Edmonds, et al. v. Merck & Co., Inc., No. 05-5450 Stinson v. Merck & Co., Inc., No. 05-5494 Watson v. Merck & Co., Inc., No. 05-5545.

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana.

March 22, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard A. Davis, Russ M. Herman, Herman, Herman, Katz & Cotlar, LLP, New Orleans, LA, Kimberly K. Hardeman, Moyer & Bergman, PLC, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Plaintiff.

Phillip A. Wittmann, Stone Pigman Walther Wittmann, LLC, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant.


ORDER & REASONS

FALLON, District Judge.

Before the Court is Merck & Co., Inc.'s ("Merck") Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec.Doc.7345) in three individual Vioxx cases on statutes of limitations grounds. The Court heard oral argument and took this motion under submission. Given the existence of factual disputes regarding both the triggering and tolling of the various limitations periods, Merck's motion is now DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases