PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges the order entered by the trial court rendered on February 27, 2007, wherein the lower court granted in part Appellant's rule 3.800(b)(2)(B) motion. Appellant argues that the order was not rendered within the 60-day time limit. Therefore, the lower court was without jurisdiction to enter the order, even though the lower court had orally ruled within the 60-day time limit. The State concedes this point.
Accordingly, the order...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
