1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 164 P.3d
  5. 164 P.3d 1163 (2007)
 

BELINSKEY v. CLOOTEN

CV04060296; A130651.

164 P.3d 1163 (2007)

214 Or. App. 172

Robyn M. BELINSKEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Julia R. CLOOTEN, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 18, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Willard E. Merkel, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Merkel & Associates.

Wendy M. Margolis, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Thomas W. Brown and Cosgrave Vergeer Kester LLP.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM and SERCOMBE, Judges.

EDMONDS, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing her complaint as a sanction for violating a discovery order under ORCP 46 B(2)(c). Plaintiff contends that the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing the complaint and that, in any event, the trial court's findings do not justify its decision or explain why a less onerous sanction was inappropriate. Plaintiff also argues that the trial court lacked the authority to order her to pay $2,500 in "cancellation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases