BEATY v. OPPEDYK

04093940L; A129191.

159 P.3d 1157 (2007)

212 Or. App. 615

Stanley L. BEATY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael OPPEDYK, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 16, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. Elizabeth Duncan, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs was Greene & Markley, P.C.

Tim J. Helfrich, Ontario, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were David R. Auxier and Yturri Rose, LLP.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and HASELTON and WOLLHEIM, Judges.


EDMONDS, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing his complaint for specific performance of a land sale contract between himself and defendant, the seller. The trial court granted defendant's motion for a directed verdict, ruling that plaintiff failed to prove that he was ready, willing, and able to perform the contract. Alternatively, the trial court ruled that the contract was too indefinite to be enforceable because it did not specify a closing date. We affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases