KIM v. MANSOORI

No. 2 CA-CV 2006-0069.

153 P.3d 1086 (2007)

Joon Nae KIM, a married man, and Chang Nae Kim, a married man, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Haider MANSOORI, a single man, Defendant/Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

March 23, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hoopes & Adams, PLC By John R. Hoopes, Chandler, Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Appellants.

Mack & Associates, P.C. By Richard V. Mack, Scott M. Drucker, and Corey I. Richter, Phoenix, Attorneys for Defendant/Appellee.


OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Appellants Joon Nae Kim and Chang Nae Kim appeal from the trial court's grant of summary judgment on their claim for attorney fees under A.R.S. § 12-341.01 against appellee Haider Mansoori. On appeal, the Kims argue Mansoori's motion for summary judgment was premature and the trial court abused its discretion when it certified the judgment as final under Rule 54(b), Ariz. R. Civ. P., 16 A.R.S., Pt...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases