SIMMERMON v. DRYVIT SYSTEMS, INC.


923 A.2d 311 (2007)

393 N.J. Super. 333

Dolores SIMMERMON, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum for the Estate of James Simmermon, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DRYVIT SYSTEMS, INC., Dryvit, New Wave Plastering Inc., The Manning Company, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 4, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald P. Sierzega, Woodbury, argued the cause for appellant (Hoffman DiMuzio, attorneys; Mr. Sierzega, of counsel and on the brief).

David N. Cohen, Short Hills, argued the cause for respondents (Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge, attorneys; Andrew P. Fishkin, of counsel; Mr. Fishkin, Mr. Cohen and Danielle Brucchieri, on the brief).

Before Judges WINKELSTEIN, FUENTES and BAXTER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

FUENTES, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, the estate of James Simmermon, appeals from the order of the Law Division granting defendant Dryvit Systems, Inc.'s (Dryvit) motion for summary judgment. Defendant is the manufacturer of a synthetic stucco used to cover plaintiff's home. Plaintiff filed this consumer fraud action in this State, alleging that the material flaked and cracked, and as a result he suffered ascertainable damages...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases