CELLULAR TEL v. 210 E 86TH ST


44 A.D.3d 77 (2007)

839 N.Y.S.2d 476

CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY et al., Respondents, v. 210 EAST 86TH STREET CORP., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 28, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kaufman Friedman Plotnicki & Grun, LLP, New York City (Howard Grun of counsel), for appellant.

Drinker Biddle & Reath, LLP, Florham Park, New Jersey (Michael E. Blaine of counsel), and Drinker Biddle & Reath, LLP, New York City (Andrew B. Joseph of counsel), for respondents.

SAXE, J.P., NARDELLI, GONZALEZ and SWEENY, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

CATTERSON, J.

In this action the plaintiff commercial tenant seeks a declaration that the defendant landlord did not validly cancel its lease. We conclude, however, that the lease was validly canceled and, accordingly, that the defendant is entitled to summary judgment.

In or about December 1997, the plaintiff Cellular Telephone Company (hereinafter referred to as Cellular) entered into a lease with the defendant 210 East 86th...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases