1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 489 F.3d
  5. 489 F.3d 719 (2007)
 

PAZ v. BRUSH ENGINEERED MATERIALS, INC.

Nos. 05-60157, 05-60388.

489 F.3d 719 (2007)

George PAZ; Barbara Faciane; Joe Lewis; Donald Jones; Ernest E. Bryan; Gregory Condiff; Odie Ladner; Henry Polk; Roy Tootle; William H. Stewart, Jr.; Margaret Ann Harris; Judith A. Lemon; Theresa Ladner; Yolanda Paz, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BRUSH ENGINEERED MATERIALS, INC.; Brush Wellman, Inc.; Wess-Del, Inc.; The Boeing Company, Defendants-Appellees. George Paz; et al., Plaintiffs, v. Brush Engineered Materials, Inc.; et al., Defendants. Joseph P. Harris; Margaret Ann Harris; Terry R. Lemon; Judith A. Lemon; Marlin Moran; Rodney Sorapuru; Hermelinda Sorapuru; Alvin Pittman, Sr., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Brush Engineered Materials, Inc.; et al., Defendants, Wess-Del, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 18, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randall Alan Smith, Smith & Fawer, Stephen Michael Wiles, F. Gerald Maples, New Orleans, LA, Robert C. Latham, Natchez, MS, Ruben Honik, Stephan Matanovic, Sherrie J. Cohen, Golomb & Honik, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Jeffery Ubersax, Jones Day, Cleveland, OH, Paul H. Stephenson, III, Watkins & Eager, Jackson, MS, for Brush Engineered Materials, Inc. and Brush Wellman, Inc.

Timothy Dale Crawley, Anderson, Crawley & Burke, Ridgeland, MS, for WessDel, Inc.

V.L. Woolston, Perkins Coie, Seattle, WA, Roy D. Campbell, III, Bradley, Arant, Rose & White, Jackson, MS, for Boeing Co.

Kristy Lynn Bennett, Law Offices of Louis H. Watson, Jr., Jackson, MS, for Wess-Del, Inc. in 05-60388.

Before DAVIS, SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED.

DENNIS, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the denial of panel rehearing:

I respectfully dissent from the refusal to rehear this case. The panel majority refuses to exercise our discretion to remand the case so that the plaintiffs can amend their complaint in light of the Mississippi Supreme Court's response to our certified question. This denial does not foreclose the plaintiffs from re-filing their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases