1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 479 F.3d
  5. 479 F.3d 726 (2007)
 

CASCADE HEALTH SOLUTIONS v. PEACEHEALTH

Nos. 05-35627, 05-35640, 05-36153, 05-36202.

479 F.3d 726 (2007)

CASCADE HEALTH SOLUTIONS fka, McKenzie-Williamette Hospital, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PEACEHEALTH, a Washington State nonprofit corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Cascade Health Solutions fka McKenzie-Williamette Hospital, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peacehealth, a Washington State nonprofit corporation, Defendant-Appellant. Cascade Health Solutions fka McKenzie-Williamette Hospital, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peacehealth, a Washington State nonprofit corporation, Defendant-Appellant. Cascade Health Solutions fka McKenzie-Williamette Hospital, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Peacehealth, a Washington State nonprofit corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 20, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael T. Garone, Esq., Nancy M. Erfle, Esq., William B. Crow, Esq., Kelly Hagan, Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt, Pacwest Center, Portland, OR, Laurence E. Thorp, Esq., Thorp, Purdy, Jewett, Urness & Wilkinson, P.C., Springfield, OR, for Cascade Health Solutions.

M. Laurence Popofsky, Esq., Heather N. Leal, Esq., Adam J. Gromfin, Heller Ehrman, LLP, San Francisco, CA, David Marx, Jr., Esq., McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Chicago, IL, Peter H. Glade, Esq., Markowitz, Herbold, Glade & Mehlhaf, P.C, Portland, OR, James H. Sneed, Esq., Linda Holleran, McDermott, Will & Emery, Washington, DC, for Peacehealth.

Before RONALD M. GOULD, RICHARD A. PAEZ, and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The court invites supplemental briefs by any amicus curiae addressing the following issue raised in this appeal: Whether a plaintiff who seeks to establish the predatory or anticompetitive conduct element of an attempted monopolization claim under § 2 of the Sherman Act by showing that the defendant offered bundled discounts to the defendant's customers must prove that the defendant's prices were below an appropriate measure of the defendant's costs....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases