SUTTON v. BERNARD

No. 06-3778.

504 F.3d 688 (2007)

Doug SUTTON and Prescott Nottingham, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Robert F. BERNARD, et al., Defendants. Appeal of: Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman LLP, lead counsel for plaintiffs, on behalf of itself and all other counsel for plaintiffs.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided October 12, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brad Friedman (argued), Milberg Weiss, New York, NY, Matthew E. Van Tine, Miller Law, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs.

James E. Hanlon, Jr., Howrey, Simon, Arnold & White, Chicago, IL, for Defendants.

Before KANNE, WILLIAMS, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.


WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

The legal claims in this multimillion dollar securities class action have been settled. The issue of attorneys' fees for class counsel, however, has not. Having saved the calculation of the fee award for the end of the litigation, the district court concluded that the "degree of success" obtained for the class was the controlling factor in its decision. As we explain more fully below, the district court failed to approximate what the market...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases