CMIECH v. ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.

Civil Action No. 3:07-CV-1495.

520 F.Supp.2d 671 (2007)

Domicella CMIECH and Peter Cmiech, h/w, Plaintiffs, v. ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC., Electrolux New Products of North America, Inc., Electrolux, Lowe's Home Centers, Inc., and Lowe's, Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.

November 2, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony R. Sherr, Joseph B. Mayers, Mayers, Menneis & Sherr, LLP, Blue Bell, PA, for Plaintiffs.

Cheryl M. Nicolson, Mallon & Blatcher, Media, PA, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM

A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.

In this case, the Plaintiffs seek remand because removal was not effected within thirty (30) days of receipt of the complaint through service or otherwise. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b). Because I find removal to have been timely, Plaintiffs motion will be denied.

LE GAL STANDARD

On a motion to remand, the removing party bears the burden of establishing the propriety of removal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases