UMSTATTD v. CENTEX HOMES, G.P.

Record No. 062152.

650 S.E.2d 527 (2007)

Kristen C. UMSTATTD, Mayor, et al. v. CENTEX HOMES, G.P.

Supreme Court of Virginia.

September 14, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Monica Taylor Monday (Barbara P. Beach, Town Atty.; Gentry Locke Rakes & Moore, Roanoke, on brief), for appellants.

John H. Foote (Michael J. Coughlin, Walsh, Colucci, Lubeley, Emrich & Walsh, on brief), Prince William, for appellee.

Present: HASSELL, C.J., KEENAN, KOONTZ, KINSER, and LEMONS, JJ., and RUSSELL and LACY, Senior Justices.


OPINION BY Senior Justice CHARLES S. RUSSELL.

This appeal presents the question whether mandamus was an appropriate remedy to compel a local land development official to accept an application for a subdivision and a preliminary subdivision plat. For the reasons stated below, we conclude that mandamus was not a proper remedy.

Facts and Proceedings

The essential facts are undisputed. In 2003, Centex...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases