INGRAM v. JONES

Nos. 06-2766, 06-2879.

507 F.3d 640 (2007)

Edmund INGRAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eddie JONES, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. Malcolm Rush, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Matthew J. Frank, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided November 14, 2007.

As Amended December 7, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene Volokh (argued), University of California, School of Law, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners-Appellants.

Leah C. Myers (argued), Office of the Attorney General, Chicago, IL, for Respondent-Appellee.

Marguerite M. Moeller (argued), Office of the Attorney General Wisconsin Department of Justice, Madison, WI, for Matthew J. Frank.

Before BAUER, MANION, and WOOD, Circuit Judges.


BAUER, Circuit Judge.

Prisoners Edward Ingram and Malcolm Rush appeal their respective district courts' decisions denying their petitions for writs of habeas corpus.1 Both Ingram and Rush filed their notices of appeal more than 30 days after their judgments. In this consolidated appeal, we asked the parties to address appellate jurisdiction in light of Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(1)'s language that an inmate's notice of appeal "is timely if it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases