1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 55 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 55 Cal.Rptr.3d 59 (2007)
 

MANDERVILLE v. PCG & S GROUP, INC.

No. D047285.

55 Cal.Rptr.3d 59 (2007)

146 Cal.App.4th 1486

Anne MANDERVILLE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PCG & S GROUP, INC. et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division One.

January 24, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stutz Artiano Shinoff & Holtz, Daniel R. Shinoff and Paul V. Carelli IV, Temecula, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Asaro, Keagy, Freeland & McKinley, Steven A. McKinley and Charles F. Campbell, San Diego, for Defendants and Respondents.

NARES, J.

Do exculpatory clauses in standardized forms used in the purchase and sale of real estate bar a claim for intentional misrepresentation brought by buyers of real property against the sellers' brokers alleging the brokers intentionally misrepresented the property could be subdivided, on the ground the buyers cannot show justifiable reliance as a matter of law? We conclude such exculpatory clauses do not preclude...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases