1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 151 P.3d
  5. 151 P.3d 990 (2007)
 

SLEASMAN v. CITY OF LACEY

No. 77590-7.

151 P.3d 990 (2007)

Stephen SLEASMAN and Barbara Sleasman, husband and wife, Petitioners, v. CITY OF LACEY, a Washington municipal corporation, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided February 8, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael G. Gusa, Kalikow & Gusa PLLC, Olympia, WA, for Petitioners.

Joseph Michael Svoboda, Attorney at Law, Lacey, WA, William Dale Kamerrer, Law Lyman Daniel Kamerrer et al, Olympia, WA, for Respondent.

SANDERS, J.

¶ 1 We are asked to determine the meaning of "undeveloped" and "partially developed" lot as these terms were used in a Lacey ordinance. In May 2002 Stephen and Barbara Sleasman cut down trees in their backyard. City of Lacey (Lacey or city) regulates tree removal on "undeveloped" or "partially developed" property, former Lacey Municipal Code (LMC) 14.32.030(C), and fined the Sleasmans $16,861 for allegedly violating chapter 14.32 LMC. Clerk's Papers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases