Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the prosecutor improperly exceeded the scope of a prior evidentiary ruling by asking the arresting officer whether he had been disciplined as a result of an Internal Affairs Division (hereinafter IAD) investigation. However, the court sustained an objection to this question, and immediately instructed the jury to disregard the arresting officer's answer.
Since the defendant neither requested...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
