The defendant argues that the duration of four orders of protection issued at the time of his sentencing exceeded the maximum limits of CPL 530.13 (4). However, the defendant failed to preserve this argument for appellate review because he did not raise the issue at sentencing or move to amend the final orders of protection on this ground (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Nieves...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.