1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 935 A.2d
  5. 935 A.2d 172 (2007)
 

FINCH v. EARL

No. 27866.

935 A.2d 172 (2007)

104 Conn.App. 515

Fred E. FINCH et al. v. Steven P. EARL et al.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided November 27, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julie L. Earl, pro se, the appellant (defendant).

V. Michael Simko, Jr., with whom, on the brief, was Lizinka C. Benton, Waterbury, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

DiPENTIMA, GRUENDEL and BORDEN, Js.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant Julie L. Earl appeals, pro se,1 from the declaratory judgment of the trial court approving the report of an attorney trial referee in favor of the plaintiffs, Fred E. Finch and Catherine M. Finch. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The case has an unusual procedural history. The plaintiffs and the defendants, Steven P. Earl, Julie Earl, David Hurtuk, Veronica Wong and Tammy Silva, own properties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases