SCOTT v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO. INS.

0312-13683; A127691.

161 P.3d 944 (2007)

213 Or. App. 351

Laura SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 13, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Helen C. Tompkins, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs was Law Office of Helen Tompkins.

R. Daniel Lindahl, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were John R. Bachofner and Bullivant Houser Bailey, PC.

Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and LANDAU and ORTEGA, Judges.


ORTEGA, J.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court's judgment denying her attorney fees in connection with her uninsured motorist claim. Plaintiff's eligibility for fees hinged on whether she submitted an adequate proof of loss more than six months before defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company consented in writing to coverage and arbitration. We affirm the judgment for State Farm.

Except where noted, the following facts are undisputed. Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases