AGOMO v. FENTY

No. 03-CV-813.

916 A.2d 181 (2007)

Emelike U. AGOMO, et al., Appellants, v. Adrian FENTY, Mayor, District of Columbia, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided February 1, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Ruffin, Jr., Washington, DC, with whom Horace L. Bradshaw, Jr., was on the brief, for appellants.

Stephen C. Rogers, Volunteer Attorney, with whom Robert J. Spagnoletti, Attorney General for the District of Columbia at the time the brief was filed, and Edward E. Schwab, Deputy Attorney General, were on the brief, for appellee.

Before FARRELL and GLICKMAN, Associate Judges, and NEBEKER, Senior Judge.


NEBEKER, Senior Judge:

Appellants Emelike U. Agomo and Auto Ward, Inc. filed a complaint against the District of Columbia under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the Automated Traffic Enforcement System ("ATE System") established by D.C.Code § 50-2209.01 (2001) et seq. violates the guarantees of due process under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. In essence, the ATE System detects moving violations under the District's traffic laws through the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases