LLOYD FRANK LOGGING v. HEALY

No. 2007AP692.

742 N.W.2d 337 (2007)

2007 WI App 249

LLOYD FRANK LOGGING and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Petitioners-Appellants v. Charles J. HEALY and Labor and Industry Review Commission, Respondents-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Opinion Filed October 30, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the petitioners-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of James O. Moermond of Stilp & Cotton, Wausau.

On behalf of the respondents-respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of J.B. Van Hollen, attorney general, and David C. Rice, assistant attorney general.

Before HOOVER, P.J., PETERSON and BRUNNER, JJ.


¶ 1 HOOVER, P.J.

Lloyd Frank Logging and its insurance carrier, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (collectively, Lloyd Frank), appeal an order of the circuit court affirming a decision by the Labor and Industry Review Commission. The Commission concluded that Charles Healy was an employee of Lloyd Frank's because he did not fulfill the statutory definition of an employer. Lloyd Frank argues that Healy was an employer primarily because he purchased a worker's compensation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases