On order of the Court, the motion to strike part of the defendant's appendix is DENIED. Although the defendant should have filed a motion to expand the record before filing the disputed material, this Court's order invited the parties to address the likelihood of success of the plaintiff's unfair labor practice claims. The disputed material appears to be relevant to that issue.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant the motion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
