1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 43 A.D.3d
  5. 43 A.D.3d 1023 (2007)
 

ARONSON RIBACK v. MARGULIS

43 A.D.3d 1023 (2007)

842 N.Y.S.2d 54

ESTHER ARONSON RIBACK et al., Appellants, v. NAIM MARGULIS, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided September 18, 2007.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Although in assessing a motion to dismiss made pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), the facts pleaded are presumed to be true and are accorded every favorable inference, bare legal conclusions as well as factual claims flatly contradicted by the record are not entitled to any such consideration (see Morone v Morone, 50 N.Y.2d 481 [1980]; Gershon v Goldberg,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases