1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 500 F.3d
  5. 500 F.3d 559 (2007)
 

WADE v. SOO LINE R.R. CORP.

No. 06-1878.

500 F.3d 559 (2007)

Michael WADE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOO LINE RAILROAD CORPORATION and Canadian Pacific Railway Company, Defendants-Appellees. George T. Brugess, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 29, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven P. Garmisa, Hoey & Farina, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Mark E. Shure (argued), Keating & Shure, Daniel J. Mohan, Daley & Mohan, George T. Brugess, Hoey & Farina, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellees.

George T. Brugess (argued), Hoey & Farina, Chicago, IL, pro se.

Steven P. Garmisa, Hoey & Farina, Chicago, IL, for Appellant.

Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and BAUER and MANION, Circuit Judges.

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.

Michael Wade alleged that he was permanently injured while operating a handbrake on the Soo Line Railroad. (The Soo Line is a subsidiary of the Canadian Pacific Railway. It is not clear from the record which company is Wade's employer; because nothing turns on the issue, we refer to both collectively as the Soo Line.) Wade brought this action under the Federal Employees Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60, seeking damages for medical...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases