Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
After the court denied his motions to preclude identification testimony for lack of timely notice pursuant to CPL 710.30 (3), the defendant proceeded with suppression hearings and received a full hearing on the fairness of the identification procedures. Thus, "any alleged deficiency in the notice provided by the People was irrelevant" (People v Kirkland,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.