1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 153 P.3d
  5. 153 P.3d 894 (2007)
 

STATE v. L.U.

No. 57407-8-I.

153 P.3d 894 (2007)

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. L.U., b.d. 02-17-89, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

March 5, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dana M. Lind, Nielsen Broman Koch PLLC, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Prosecuting Atty. King County, King Co. Pros./App. Unit Supervisor, Yarden F. Weidenfeld, King County Prosecutor, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

AGID, J.

¶ 1 L.U. was convicted of taking a motor vehicle without permission and vehicle prowling after he confessed to writing graffiti in a stolen car. He contends that his confession should not have been admitted at trial because it was coerced by a detective's promise that L.U. would not be charged with a crime for the graffiti. L.U. also argues that his two convictions violate the merger doctrine. Because we conclude...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases