1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 514 F.Supp.2d
  5. 514 F.Supp.2d 511 (2007)
 

RENTROP v. SPECTRANETICS CORP.

No. 04 Civ. 0101(PKC).

514 F.Supp.2d 511 (2007)

Dr. Peter RENTROP, Plaintiff, v. The SPECTRANETICS CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

August 23, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Margaret J. Gwiazda, Marvin S. Gittes, Richard. Mark Lher, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popep, P.C., New York City, for Plaintiff.

Partha Pratim Chattoraj, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges LLP, New York City, Ralph Terrance Rader, Rader, Fishman & Grauer, PLLC, Bloomfield Hills, MI, Jennifer J. Barret, Michael Barry Carlinsky, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges LLP, New York City, for Defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

P. KEVIN CASTEL, District Judge.

These are the Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law on the equitable defenses of inequitable conduct and implied-in-law license asserted by the Spectranetics Corporation ("Spectranetics") against Peter Rentrop, M.D., in an action commenced by Dr. Rentrop for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,673,064 (the "'064 Patent"). This Court heard the witnesses and observed their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases