1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 915 A.2d
  5. 915 A.2d 89 (2007)
 

RUTGERS CAS. INS. CO. v. LaCROIX

915 A.2d 89 (2007)

390 N.J. Super. 277

RUTGERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Robert LaCROIX and Chrissy LaCroix, Defendants-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 5, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bridget Saro argued the cause for appellants (Frank J. Zazzaro, Montclair, attorneys; Ms. Saro, on the brief).

Susan L. Moreinis, Collingswood, argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges LISA, HOLSTON, JR. and GRALL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HOLSTON, JR., J.A.D.

This is an insurance coverage case. Defendant, Chrissy LaCroix (Chrissy), sustained serious personal injuries in a July 10, 2003 automobile accident. She was driving a vehicle owned by her father, Robert LaCroix (Robert), and insured by plaintiff, Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company (Rutgers). She had her father's permission to drive the car. Chrissy appeals from the Law Division's March 1, 2006...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases