MULHALL v. HANNAFIN


45 A.D.3d 55 (2007)

841 N.Y.S.2d 282

VICTORIA MULHALL et al., Respondents, v. JO A. HANNAFIN, M.D., et al., Defendants, and SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

August 30, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Goodwin Procter LLP, New York City (Glenn S. Kerner, Diana M. Scharf and Josephine Liu of counsel), for appellant.

Asher & Associates, P.C., New York City (Robert J. Poblete of counsel), for respondents.

ANDRIAS, J.P., SAXE, GONZALEZ and McGUIRE, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

SULLIVAN, J.

In this products liability action, plaintiff Victoria Mulhall is alleged to have developed inflammatory conditions known as adhesive capsulitis and synovitis after having arthroscopic shoulder surgery, during which a surgical device was implanted in her right shoulder. The device, known as Suretac, a Smith & Nephew product, is a bioabsorbable tack (in layman's terms, an absorbable thumbtack) designed to fix or stabilize...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases