HEIL CO. v. POLAR CORP.

No. 2-05-101-CV.

191 S.W.3d 805 (2006)

The HEIL COMPANY, Appellant, v. POLAR CORPORATION, as Surviving Entity of Merger between Pentron, Inc. and Polar; and Richard L. Frank, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

April 6, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cowles & Thompson, P.C., R. Michael Northrup and Sim Israeloff, Dallas, for appellant.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges, L.L.P., T. Ray Guy and Paige Holden Montgomery, Dallas, for appellees.

PANEL B: LIVINGSTON, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.


OPINION

TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Appellant The Heil Company ("Heil") challenges the trial court's order denying its motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of appellees Polar Corporation, as the surviving entity of a merger between Pentron, Inc. ("Pentron") and Polar ("Polar"), and Richard L. Frank ("Frank"). In three issues, Heil complains that the trial court erred by denying its motion for summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases