ROSENBAUM v. CITY OF NEW YORK


8 N.Y.3d 1 (2006)

861 N.E.2d 43

828 N.Y.S.2d 228

HAROLD ROSENBAUM, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided November 20, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Deborah A. Brenner, Leonard Koerner and Larry A. Sonnenshein of counsel), for appellants.

Derfner & Gillett, LLP, New York City (Donald A. Derfner, and David P. Gillett of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges CIPARICK, ROSENBLATT, GRAFFEO, SMITH and PIGOTT concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

READ, J.

On this appeal, we are asked to decide whether a letter dated August 18, 1994 sent by the attorney for plaintiff Harold Rosenbaum to an attorney in the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) satisfies General Municipal Law § 50-e. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that it does not.

I.

On August 31, 1993, plaintiff purchased...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases