1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 454 F.Supp.2d
  5. 454 F.Supp.2d 524 (2006)
 

LANMARK TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. CANALES

No. 1:06CV327.

454 F.Supp.2d 524 (2006)

LANMARK TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. Arturo CANALES, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division.

September 29, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey Paul Hildebrant, Hildebrant & Associates, McLean, VA, for Plaintiff.

John Joseph Rigby, Mclnroy & Rigby, LLP, Arlington, VA, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

In this diversity action for breach of contract and fraudulent misrepresentation, plaintiff, Lanmark Technology, Inc. ("Lanmark"), alleges that its former employee, defendant Arturo Canales, (i) breached a non-compete clause in his employment agreement and (ii) fraudulently induced Lanmark to hire him based on misrepresentations of his educational experience. Chiefly at issue on summary judgment is (a) whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases