1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 203 S.W.3d
  5. 203 S.W.3d 768 (2006)
 

CANTRELL v. STATE

No. ED 86202.

203 S.W.3d 768 (2006)

David CANTRELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

October 17, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Cantrell, Bowling Green, MO, pro se.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Victor J. Melenbrink; Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., and MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Cantrell appeals from the motion court's judgment and order denying his pro se Rule 29.12(b) Motion To Correct Sentence and Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases