1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 29 A.D.3d
  5. 29 A.D.3d 936 (2006)
 

DISANTO v. DISANTO

29 A.D.3d 936 (2006)

815 N.Y.S.2d 468

DOROTHY M. DISANTO, Respondent, v. FRANK J. DISANTO, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 30, 2006.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Absent a legal disqualification under Judiciary Law § 14, a trial judge is the sole arbiter of his or her recusal. Since the husband failed to demonstrate that any of the Supreme Court's determinations in the case were the result of bias, the court providently exercised its discretion in denying his motion for recusal (see York v York, 250 A.D.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases