1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 129 P.3d
  5. 129 P.3d 831 (2006)
 

POWELL v. ASSOCIATED COUNSEL FOR ACCUSED

No. 52614-6-I.

129 P.3d 831 (2006)

131 Wash.App. 810

Clint L. POWELL, individually, Appellant, v. ASSOCIATED COUNSEL FOR the ACCUSED, aka ACA, a Washington State Corporation, Todd M. Gruenhagen and Jane Doe Gruenhagen, husband and wife and the marital community composed thereof, George Eppler and Jane Doe Eppler, husband and wife and the marital community composed thereof, John Doe 1-4, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

March 6, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry James Landry, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Clint L. Powell, Appearing Pro Se.

Christopher Holm Howard, Holland Knight LLP, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

BAKER, J.

¶ 1 On February 14, 2005, we reversed the trial court's order dismissing Clint Powell's legal malpractice claim against the attorneys who represented him in a criminal matter.1 We held that the innocence requirement articulated in Falkner v. Foshaug2 does not require dismissal of Powell's lawsuit. Subsequently, our Supreme Court granted the defendants' petition for review and remanded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases