1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 40 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 40 Cal.Rptr.3d 899 (2006)
 

CITY OF DINUBA v. COUNTY OF TULARE

No. F046252.

40 Cal.Rptr.3d 899 (2006)

CITY OF DINUBA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF TULARE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

March 28, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, Steven R. Meyers, Andrea J. Saltzman and Joseph M. Quinn, Oakland; Tuttle & McCloskey and Daniel T. McCloskey, Palo Alto, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri, Inc., Thomas F. Winfield III and Michael H. Wallenstein, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

LEVY, J.

Countries are required by law to collect property taxes on behalf of local taxing entities and then distribute the revenue to these entities pursuant to statute. This appeal concerns such distributions by respondents, the County of Tulare and the responsible county officials (collectively Tulare), to appellant, the City of Dinuba Redevelopment Agency (Agency).

The Agency conducted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases