1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 719 N.W.2d
  5. 719 N.W.2d 213 (2006)
 

STATE v. ULMER

No. A05-1148.

719 N.W.2d 213 (2006)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Jeffrey ULMER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 8, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Raymond F. Schmitz, Olmsted County Attorney, Jeffrey D. Hill, Assistant County Attorney, Rochester, MN, for respondent.

Zachary C. Bauer, Assistant Public Defender, Third Judicial District, Rochester, MN, for appellant.

Considered and decided by WRIGHT, Presiding Judge; SHUMAKER, Judge; and ROSS, Judge.

OPINION

ROSS, Judge.

This case involves disturbing behavior— an adult stranger's peering over a urinal partition to watch a seven-year-old boy urinate. In this appeal from a conviction of interference with privacy, appellant Jeffrey Ulmer argues that the district court erred by ruling that his conduct violated Minnesota's Interference with Privacy statute. Because we conclude that a person has an expectation of privacy when using a partitioned urinal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases