PRAXAIR, INC. v. ATMI, INC.

No. CIV.03-1158-SLR.

445 F.Supp.2d 473 (2006)

PRAXAIR, INC. and Praxair Technology, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. ATMI, INC. and Advanced Technology Materials, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

August 17, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack B. Blumenfeld, Esquire of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, Delaware. Counsel for Plaintiff. Of Counsel: Herbert F. Schwartz, Esquire, Christopher J. Harnett, Esquire and Steven Pepe, Esquire of Ropes & Gray LLP, New York, New York, Steven T. Trinker, Esquire of Praxair, Inc., Danbury, Connecticut.

Frederick L. Cottrell, III, Esquire and Alyssa M. Schwartz, Esquire of Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware. Counsel for Defendant. Of Counsel: Nicholas L. Coch, Esquire, Theodore J. Mlynar, Esquire and Keith A. Walter, Esquire of Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP, New York City.


OPINION

SUE L. ROBINSON, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

1. The court tried the single issue of inequitable conduct in a bench trial on December 12, 2005. The court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a) and 2201(a). Having considered the documentary evidence and testimony, the court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a). Also before the court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases