1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 40 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 40 Cal.Rptr.3d 858 (2006)
 

HOLDEN v. LOS ANGELES CITY ETHICS COM'N

No. B170359.

40 Cal.Rptr.3d 858 (2006)

137 Cal.App.4th 1274

Nate HOLDEN, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. LOS ANGELES CITY ETHICS COMMISSION, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

March 27, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Geragos & Geragos, Mark Geragos, Los Angeles, and Vicken Sonentz-Papazian, Glendale, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Rockard J. Delgadillo, City Attorney, Katherine J. Hamilton, Assistant City Attorney, and Claudia McGee Henry, Senior Assistant City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

WILLHITE, J.

In this case, we are asked to determine when a decision of the Los Angeles City Ethics Commission finding violations of campaign financing law becomes final for the purposes of the statute of limitations set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6. We hold that the decision is final when, at a public meeting, the Commission adopts findings and an order supporting its decision. Because in this case appellants Nate Holden and Anne Froehlich

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases