IN RE STANLEY

Nos. 05-MA-177 and 05-MA-183.

165 Ohio App.3d 726 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1279

In re STANLEY et al.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Mahoning County.

Decided March 14, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Gains, Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney, and Rhys B. Cartwright-Jones, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant, state of Ohio.

Brennan, Frederick, Vouros & Yarwood, Ltd., and Ronald D. Yarwood, for appellee Craig Franklin.

Heidi Hanni, Michael Gollings, Ronald Knickerbocker, and John Schultz, for appellees Lavelle Stanley, Lavar Paige, Aundre Scrutchen, Montrail Berry, Keith Black.


DONOFRIO, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals from six Mahoning County Juvenile Court judgments denying its motions to bind over six juveniles.

{¶ 2} This case involves two appeals that have been consolidated.

{¶ 3} One appeal involves juvenile Craig Franklin. On July 6, 2005, a complaint was filed against Franklin, who was 17 at the time, alleging that he was a delinquent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases