STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner,
v.
Brian HIBL, Defendant-Respondent.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Oral argument April 5, 2006.
Decided May 26, 2006.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner, the cause was argued by Christopher G. Wren, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was Peggy A. Lautenschlager, attorney general.
For the defendant-respondent there was a brief by Joel H. Rosenthal and Luck & Rosenthal, S.C., Milwaukee, and oral argument by Joel H. Rosenthal.
An amicus curiae brief was filed by Keith A. Findley, John A. Pray, Byron C. Lichstein and University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, on behalf of the Wisconsin Innocence Project of the Frank J. Remington Center, University of Wisconsin Law School.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
¶ 1. ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J.
The State of Wisconsin petitions for review of a published court of appeals' decision affirming the circuit court's order that suppressed the State's eyewitness identification evidence against the defendant, Brian Hibl.1 The eyewitness, who was initially able to describe Hibl only as a "white male," identified Hibl...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.