1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 423 F.Supp.2d
  5. 423 F.Supp.2d 456 (2006)
 

TRISTRATA TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. MARY KAY, INC.

No. CIV.A. 01-127-JJF.

423 F.Supp.2d 456 (2006)

TRISTRATA TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. MARY KAY, INC. Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

March 31, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur G. Connolly, III, Esquire and Francis DiGiovanni, Esquire of Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz LLP, Wilmington, DE, Of Counsel: Michael V. Ciresi, Esquire, Jan M. Conlin, Esquire, and Tara Falsani Harkins, Esquire of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN and Kevin M. McGovern, Esquire, and Brian T. Foley, Esquire of McGovern & Associates, New York City, for Plaintiff.

Rodger D. Smith II, Esquire of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel, Wilmington, DE, Of Counsel: Roy W. Hardin, Esquire and Charles E. Phipps, Esquire of Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP, Dallas, TX, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FARNAN, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are five motions. Plaintiff, Tristrata Technology, Inc. ("Tristrata") has filed two motions: Plaintiff's Motion For Permanent Injunction (D.I. 307) and Plaintiffs Motion For Entry Of Final Judgment (D.I. 309). Defendant Mary Kay, Inc. ("Mary Kay") has filed three motions: Mary Kay's Rule 50(a) Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases