1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 41 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 41 Cal.Rptr.3d 838 (2006)
 

PITTS v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO

No. C049385.

41 Cal.Rptr.3d 838 (2006)

138 Cal.App.4th 853

Adrianne PITTS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

April 17, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mastagni, Holstedt, Ameck, Miller, Johnsen & Uhrhammer, Amanda Uhrhammer and David J. Garcia, Burbank, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Samuel L. Jackson, City Attorney, Matthew D. Ruyak, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.

DAVIS, Acting P.J.

After a hearing officer ruled in December 2002 that she was ineligible for disability retirement, plaintiff Adrianne Pitts requested a return to active status as a police officer (from which she had been on leave without pay since August 2000). When the defendants1 informed her in February 2003 that she would need to satisfy several conditions as part of her return to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases