WALTER v. PIKE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

No. 3:03-CV-1690.

465 F.Supp.2d 409 (2006)

Susan L. WALTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PIKE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, and the Pike County District Attorney's Office, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.

November 29, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel J. O'Brien, John A. Orlando, Mary E. Dixon, White and Williams LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiffs.

Gerard J. Geiger, Newman, Williams, Mishkin, Corveleyn, Wolfe & Fareri, Stroudsburg, PA, David M. Maselli, Susan B. Ayres, Wright & O'Donnell, P.C., Conshohocken, PA, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM

CAPUTO, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are three motions for summary judgment. (Docs. 56, 59-1, and 63-1.) For the reasons set forth below, Defendants' motions will be granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiffs' substantive due process claim will be denied. Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiffs' procedural due process claim will be granted. Defendants Westfall Township...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases