1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 238 S.W.3d
  5. 238 S.W.3d 635 (2006)
 

NETTLES v. CITY OF LITTLE ROCK

No. CA 06-82.

238 S.W.3d 635 (2006)

Jim NETTLES and Shirley Nettles, Appellants v. CITY OF LITTLE ROCK; City of Little Rock Planning Comm., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas.

September 6, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Appellants, pro se.

William C. Mann, III, Chief Deputy City Att'y, Little Rock, AR, for appellees.

KAREN R. BAKER, Judge.

This appeal arises from the Pulaski County Circuit Court's finding that it was without jurisdiction to review the pro se appellants Jim and Shirley Nettles' appeal that challenged a decision by the City of Little Rock and the City of Little Rock Planning Commission, appellees. The primary issue on appeal to this court concerns the sufficiency of the Nettles' affidavit to the trial court asserting their intent to appeal the appellees' decision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases