CONSUMER DEFENSE GROUP et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,
v.
RENTAL HOUSING INDUSTRY MEMBERS, Defendants and Respondents.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 24, 2006.
March 24, 2006.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Thomas J. Greene, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Theodora Berger, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Kathryn W. Egolf and Edward G. Weil, Deputies Attorney General, for Objector and Appellant People of the State of California.
Graham & Martin, Anthony G. Graham and Michael J. Martin, Irvine, for Plaintiffs and Respondents Consumer Defense Group and The McKenzie Group.
Jeffer, Mangels Butler & Marmaro, Jeffrey K. Riffer, Malcolm Weiss and David Waite, Los Angeles, for Rental Housing Industry Members.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.
OPINION
SILLS, P.J.
I. INTRODUCTION
A prerequisite for the private enforcement by way of litigation of the warning provisions of Proposition 65 is a 60-day notice from the would-be private enforcer to the alleged violator and to relevant prosecutorial authorities — particularly the Attorney General's office — sufficient to give the alleged violator and the appropriate governmental authorities...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
