1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 708 N.W.2d
  5. 708 N.W.2d 162 (2006)
 

MENDOTA GOLF v. CITY OF MENDOTA HGTS.

No. A04-206.

708 N.W.2d 162 (2006)

MENDOTA GOLF, LLP, Respondent, v. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 10, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clifford M. Greene, Robin M. Wolpert, Greene Espel, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, Pierre N. Regnier, Jessica E. Schwie, Jardine, Logan & O'Brien, P.L.L.P., Lake Elmo, Daniel S. Schleck, Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.

S. Todd Rapp, Eagan, for respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.

Appellant City of Mendota Heights appeals from a Minnesota Court of Appeals decision affirming a Dakota County District Court writ of mandamus, which compels the city to amend its comprehensive plan to allow respondent Mendota Golf, LLP, to turn its golf course property into a residential development. We reverse, concluding that the city did not have a clear duty to amend its comprehensive plan and the city had a rational...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases