SKENDER v. BRUNSONBUILT CONSTR. & DEV. CO.

No. 44959.

148 P.3d 710 (2006)

Marilyn SKENDER and David Dziurda, Appellants, v. BRUNSONBUILT CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC; Brunsonbuilt Construction & Development, a Nevada General Partnership; Edward B. McCaffrey, III, an Individual and General Partner; and Douglas C. Brunson, an Individual and General Partner, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

December 28, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hale Lane Peek Dennison & Howard and Alex J. Flangas, Reno; Molof & Vohl and Robert C. Vohl, Reno, for Appellants.

Guenther and Castronova LLP and Stephen G. Castronova, Reno, for Respondents.

Before BECKER, HARDESTY and PARRAGUIRRE, JJ.


OPINION

HARDESTY, J.

In this appeal, we address two issues. First, we clarify the proper use of comparative negligence jury instructions in constructional defect cases. We conclude that the use of a comparative negligence jury instruction is only appropriate in constructional defect cases that properly assert a negligence claim under Shuette v. Beazer Homes Holdings Corp.1 Second, we emphasize the importance of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases