PACIFICORP POWER v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

(TC 4592; SC S51403).

131 P.3d 725 (2006)

340 Or. 204

PACIFICORP POWER MARKETING, INC., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided March 16, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James N. Westwood, of Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was David L. Canary, of Garvey Schubert Barer, Portland.

Marilyn J. Harbur, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the briefs were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Melisse S. Cunningham, Assistant Attorney General.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, DURHAM, RIGGS, DE MUNIZ, BALMER, and KISTLER, Justices.


CARSON, J.

In this property tax case, we are called upon to decide whether appellant, PacifiCorp Power Marketing, Inc. (PPM),1 is subject to ad valorem taxation by the Department of Revenue (department) based upon its contract rights relating to a municipally owned electricity cogeneration facility (facility). The department assessed the facility and taxed PPM for the 2002-03 tax year,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases