1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 32 A.D.3d
  5. 32 A.D.3d 820 (2006)
 

FRIEDMAN v. MARCUS

32 A.D.3d 820 (2006)

821 N.Y.S.2d 136

ANDREA FRIEDMAN et al., Appellants, v. STEPHEN H. MARCUS et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

September 12, 2006.

Ordered that the judgment and the order are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiffs contend that the respondents' attorney improperly argued in summation that a second injury, a month after the first, triggered the injured plaintiff's reflex sympathetic dystrophy (hereinafter RSD). This argument was offered to explain why the injured plaintiff's RSD was not in an acute stage when the defendant Stephen H. Marcus previously saw the injured plaintiff. The plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases